Welcome to Glass House Sign in | Help

Transparency and Society

Tom Friedman today opines about how the increasingly transparent nature of the world, and the persistence of memory that technology brings to the equation is changing the way he personally behaves. Here's the link, hidden in  Times Select, and there is irony there, if you think hard enough. His key point:

When everyone has a blog, a MySpace page or Facebook entry, everyone is a publisher. When everyone has a cellphone with a camera in it, everyone is a paparazzo. When everyone can upload video on YouTube, everyone is filmmaker. When everyone is a publisher, paparazzo or filmmaker, everyone else is a public figure. We’re all public figures now. The blogosphere has made the global discussion so much richer — and each of us so much more transparent.

The implications of all this are the subject of a new book by Dov Seidman, founder and C.E.O. of LRN, a business ethics company. His book is simply called “How.” Because Seidman’s simple thesis is that in this transparent world “how” you live your life and “how” you conduct your business matters more than ever, because so many people can now see into what you do and tell so many other people about it on their own without any editor. To win now, he argues, you have to turn these new conditions to your advantage.

He misses, IMHO, the lessons here. It's not that young people will be hurt by their transparency, or that business will not just be able to "hire a PR firm to fix the problem by taking a reporter to lunch." Oh that it were that simple! The implications are also not in the simple nostrum about listening to customers, empowering employees and building trust and loyalty.

Instead, the implications are on how individuals and society will adapt to technology, and how technology will adapt to society. Our networks are as much online as offline, and our friends and acquaintances live in both worlds as well. The persistence of our digital footprints, while important, is not the biggest driver of change. Instead, it is the role of the community and network that is now forming.

Published Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:42 AM by FrankShaw

Comments

 

Lynann Bradbury said:

Seidman's point about the nature of blogging, social networking and other "new" communication tools causing corporations to be more transparent is really sad to me:  a) because it's old (isn't that what Shel Israel and Robert Scoble were talking about in Naked Conversations two year ago?), and b) because it speaks to a sorry state that transparency is driving the ethics discussion.  

Are we putting too much emphasis on the medium/s, rather than what's driving the message?  (e.g. Perhaps he should write a sequel called "What").  If you choose to live in a glass house, does it matter if you get/give your news through social networks, YouTube or any other medium?  Integrity shouldn't need to change the channel.

June 27, 2007 10:40 AM
 

Jon Garfunkel said:

Agreed with Lynann.

I do compliance work in my day job, and I do research on Internet privacy. This was my response: http://civilities.net/Peeping_Tom_Friedman. The real irony is that Friedman praises one pillar of Justice Brandeis's liberalism (corporate transparency) while dropping the other one (personal privacy)-- and Friedman graduated from Brandeis.

Sure, there's irony in the fact that, like a black hole, Friedman's column won't come up in a Google search, but many of its after-effects will (blog posts like this). On the other hand, that's not as devastating as the fact that, like the tree falling the forest, many blog posts come up in a Google search but have no after-effects at all.  

June 27, 2007 3:42 PM
 

Patrick Shaw said:

Interesting -because I heard a snippet on NPR about the book - the author was participating in a QA session - and it sounded to me like the book was about more than "how" - it was about ensuring that your values were clear, shared, respected - and in alignment with "how" you lived - both at home, in the office, and online.

And this isn't new pondering - The Transparent Society was written back in the 1990's. I'm interested in reading the book to see where the emphasis falls.

June 28, 2007 11:50 AM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

WE reserves the right to refuse to post or to edit or remove, in whole or in part, any Information that is, in WE's sole discretion, unacceptable, undesirable or in violation of these rules.
Submit

Syndication



» Blogs that link here
» View my profile

Powered by Technorati