Welcome to Glass House Sign in | Help

Mowing Down Astroturf

See this page 1 story in the WSJ today -- a better example of both astroturfing and mowing it down would be hard to find. Astroturfing, of course, is the tactic of someone (usually a corporation) of pretending to be someone else -- often something that looks like a populist, grass roots uprising. And what could be more grass roots than a bunch of renters complaining about the mortgage bailout? Thus "angryrenter.com" was born. And the journal quickly punctures the facade with a delightful story that spells out who is behind the site and why. Look at these gems:

Angry they may be, but the people behind AngryRenter.com are certainly not renters. Though it purports to be a spontaneous uprising, AngryRenter.com is actually a product of an inside-the-Beltway conservative advocacy organization led by *** Armey, the former House majority leader, and publishing magnate Steve Forbes, a fellow Republican. It's a fake grass-roots effort -- what politicos call an AstroTurf campaign -- that provides a window into the sleight-of-hand ways of Washington.

and then it skewers some of those behind the organization:

FreedomWorks President Matthew Kibbe, a former top aide to a Republican lawmaker, says the site is an effort to "reach out" to renters who share the free-market views of Messrs. Armey, Forbes and others. Mr. Kibbe owns his own home on Capitol Hill in Washington, valued by local tax authorities at $1.17 million. "I'm an angry homeowner who pays his mortgage," Mr. Kibbe says

Mr. Forbes -- the chairman and chief executive of Forbes, a former Republican presidential candidate and an unpaid FreedomWorks board member -- owns a 7,966-square-foot house on 9.5 acres in Bedminster, N.J., assessed by county tax authorities at $2.78 million. He owns 111.8 more acres next door, registered as farmland and assessed for tax purposes at $45,500. The county lists at least half a dozen other Forbes properties in the area. The Forbes family has sold off its private island in Fiji and palace in Morocco, but still owns a château in France.

Mr. Armey, FreedomWorks's chairman, left Congress in 2003 and now lobbies his former colleagues as a senior policy adviser at DLA Piper, an international law and lobbying firm. He earns $100,833 a year for four hours a week working for FreedomWorks Inc., the organization's advocacy arm, and an additional $403,333 for 32 hours a week working for FreedomWorks Foundation, its tax-deductible, educational wing, according to federal tax filings.

Mr. Armey owns a house on 78.5 acres in Denton County, Texas, north of Dallas. In response to a public-information request, local authorities revealed that the land and house are worth a combined $1.7 million.

There are two points worth making here. First, I think the days of astroturf campaigns are quickly coming to an end -- the level of easy transparency and information sharing available really mitigates any positive impact they might have. Second, the idea of manipulation via deception has to stop -- the stated goals of this group are not intrinsically bad -- instead of hiding behind a facade the should put them into the public square and argue them on their own merits.

Published Saturday, May 17, 2008 6:43 AM by FrankShaw

Comments

 

paul said:

I got involved in this discussion yesterday through Twitter;

http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/splommenters-please-no-comment/

May 18, 2008 7:59 AM
 

Brendan Steinhauser said:

A little reporting might be useful in this case. Watch this video of our members visiting their congressman and then try to argue that we don't have real grassroots members.

http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/05/22/freedomworks-north-carolina-releases-video-of-their-grassroots-activism/

May 22, 2008 11:26 AM
 

Matt said:

Apparently, you haven't done your research! Go to the angryrenter.org and freedomworks.org websites! Angryrenter has the FreedomWorks name on EVERY page!

Plus, before you label something "astroturf," you should look at the membership. Disregarding the 15 people who work in the Washington FreedomWorks office, there are approximately 500,000 grassroots members of FreedomWorks. I should know- I'M ONE OF THEM.

An Iowan living in South and North Dakota intermittently, I'm a grassroots member of FreedomWorks.

Your assertion that FreedomWorks is being deceptive is both ignorant and bunk. Again, the FreedomWorks' name is plastered on the bottom of all pages of angryrenter.org

Do your research!!!

May 22, 2008 12:12 PM
 

FrankShaw said:

Hard to see how this does not qualify as astroturf. Doesn't mean there are not real people involved...

May 22, 2008 12:19 PM
 

Matt said:

Hard to see? Check out their photo albums, for Christ's sake!

http://www.freedomworks.org/08032006/

I'm in several of those photos!

May 23, 2008 10:48 AM
 

Don Yelton said:

I love the orginal comments about the farm land being valued at 45,000.  That is the 111 acres.  What is best letting the farmland be valued at 45,000 or taxing it so hight that the owner has to sell.  You know regardles of ones worth land prices are getting so high that it forces owners to sale.

I think it is much better to have low value on non developed land because that provides oxygen, takes up carbon dioxide, and give the water someplace to hit and soak in so as to recharge the grownwater.

That is better than taking tax dollars of everyone and giving it to some so called green conservation organization to buy up development rights.

Thanks be to God or what ever spirit you worship that men who have money work to educate others on the simple facts of life.  You can not lift the poor up by taking from the the rich and giving to the poor. You can not help the helpless by destroying the helpful.   You can not educate the unwilling to learn.  

But Freedom Works put it money where its mouth is as and the strength of the organization is in the simple hardworking freedom loving everyday people and that is something that most web surfers and blog hounds and pseudo educated dumb butts would not understand.

I am one of those grass roots people that devote 24-7 to pointing out the stupidity of the sexual intellectuals and I am an avid supporter of Freedom Works because I believe in more freedom, less government and lower taxes.   Is too foreign for you to even comprehend ?

May 27, 2008 8:18 AM
 

Kevin Watson said:

I'd heartily disagree with Frank that this is a clear cut case of astroturfing.  I'd base my claim on the belief that the concept of astroturfing is a vague definition.  Does a political movement have to originate 100% organically with no outside support to avoid the term astroturfing?

If so, does the fact that groups like moveon.org were started not with seven figure seed money make them astroturf?  When groups like the League of Women Voters receive funding to undertake specific public policy projects, if they fail to disclose the source and amount of that funding, do they become astroturf?

Is a movement/campaign astroturf because it was started, or incubated or grown with an outside contribution, or does that outside contribution have to be from a particular entity?

Is it ok to start a movement with a grant from a foundation, how about a corporation or individual?

Aside from small, local efforts, most political groups and grassroots activity gets a boost along the way from some outside interest.  I think astroturfing has always been a lousy term that is frequently abused, not by those who oppose the process in question, but more often by those that oppose the underlying principles put forth by the alleged 'astroturfers'.

Even the PRSA code of ethics is worthless on this subject.  In their guidance to members, they suggest the issue is the sponsorship of 'front groups' advocating the disclosure of funding is necessary to avoid the astroturf label.  However, lots of well established non-profit advocacy groups refuse to disclose the details of all of their donors.

The League of Women Voters does not disclose their donors.  They've undertaken efforts in public affairs that have been wholly created to fulfill an existing 6 figure grant opportunity but do not disclose that the work they are doing was paid for by an outside entity, let alone give the public information on the amount of money they received to undertake the particular effort in question.  Yet, I won't hold my breath waiting for the PRSA or anyone else to call their efforts astroturf.

Astroturfing is more often the cry of a political opponent, suggesting, that when the grassroots is greener on the other side, it must somehow be fake.

May 29, 2008 7:16 AM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

WE reserves the right to refuse to post or to edit or remove, in whole or in part, any Information that is, in WE's sole discretion, unacceptable, undesirable or in violation of these rules.
Submit

Syndication



» Blogs that link here
» View my profile

Powered by Technorati