Welcome to Glass House Sign in | Help

  • Monday, May 12, 2008 8:03 PM

    Super cool new effort from the folks at Microsoft Research -- I saw this a few weeks back and was blown away (but I didn't cry ;) ).  Here is the NYT article, and here is a link to check it out yourself -- which I would really recommend. Nothing communication focused here -- just a great example of software innovation!

     
  • Friday, May 09, 2008 6:55 AM

    A common theme I've been striking for a few years is the impact transparency has on the world we live in. It's harder to hide the truth than ever before in an era of videos on YouTube and people with cell phone cameras and access to the web, and the availability of reliable search engines that can turn up just what people said lo those many years ago. Today, yet another example, this time courtesy of Harvey Araton at the NYT, writing about the New England Patriots cheating. In this case, both the cheating coach and the the commissioner who hopes to bury the problem are living in an era where they thought information in digital form could be hidden/destroyed. The arrival of more tapes shows that's not the case.

    This is also a good example of crisis communication gone wrong. The problem could've been solved last year with swift and final action and a full airing of facts. Instead, the NFL destroyed tapes, played secret and said, essentially, "trust us." That is not a winning strategy.

    So instead of a quickly contained bad story, they had a year of bad press, culminating in controversy around the SuperBowl, the most important event of the year. And here they are again -- dealing with the problem one more time. Hint to the NFL: own the news, disclose the information, take action and move on.

     
  • Wednesday, May 07, 2008 7:33 AM

    Things have been a bit busy, so I've been behind a bit in blogging. Two stories over the last few days are worth pointing to. The first, in the Economist, looks at some of the underlying economic trends driving disruption in the media overall -- it's not totally grim, but there are certainly some dark passages:

    Pick almost any American newspaper company and you can tell a similar story. The ABC reported that for the 530 biggest dailies, average circulation in the past six months was 3.6% lower than in the same period a year earlier; for Sunday papers, it was 4.6% lower. Ad revenues are plunging across the board: by 22.3% at Media General, for example. In 2007 total newspaper revenues fell to $42.2 billion, not to be sniffed at, certainly, but a lot less than the peak of $48.7 billion in 2000.

    But tucked neatly down at the end was the stuff I tend to see:

    Not all is lost, however. Plenty of innovation is taking place, particularly at local papers, as the latest “Newspaper Next” report from the American Press Institute, an industry group, makes clear. It quotes 24 examples of newspapers becoming “information and connection utilities”, through such offerings as local internet forums. The Pocono Record has renamed reporters “content managers”, since they oversee all the coverage of their beat, in print and online, and get a bonus for higher web traffic.

    The hero for industry optimists is Brian Tierney, a former public-relations executive who led a group of investors that borrowed heavily to buy Philadelphia's two main dailies. He has since revived them with a vigorous marketing drive. He is also finding new ways to drum up advertising, such as introducing a business column sponsored by a local bank. People said pigs will fly before our circulation rises, Mr Tierney recalled in a recent speech, before recounting how he celebrated a rise in circulation by projecting flying pigs onto the walls of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

    Then over in the NYT earlier this week, Steve Lohr writes about the evolution of IDG. As the story notes:

    "The excellent thing, and good news, for publishers is that there is life after print — in fact, a better life after print,” said Patrick J. McGovern, the founder and chairman of I.D.G.

    The biggest single step in the company’s online shift came on April 2, 2007, when the last print edition of InfoWorld appeared and it became a Web-only publication. InfoWorld, a weekly, started out as Intelligent Machines Journal in 1978; I.D.G. bought it a year later, and it has long been one of the company’s flagship magazines.

    There were nervous months after the switch as the company awaited the reaction from advertisers and readers, but before long InfoWorld’s Web audience was growing and its business improved. Today, I.D.G. says, the InfoWorld Web site is generating ad revenue of $1.6 million a month with operating profit margins of 37 percent. A year earlier, when it had both print and online versions, InfoWorld had a slight operating loss on monthly revenue of $1.5 million.

    Both stories showcase the daunting challenges and changes the media face, but also note that the changing economic model can be an opportunity as well. Unique content that is tailored to the right audience, news, entertainment, opinion, whatever, will find a certain level of viewers -- online/offline or a combination thereof.

     
  • Sunday, May 04, 2008 7:19 PM

    My brother and I were in Vancouver today for the marathon -- lots of training to get ready for this one. Our goal was 3:30. Pat finished at 3:32, and I finished 65 percent of the race, dropping out after mile 17. It was pretty frustrating, on our last long training run three weeks ago I injured my Achilles tendon. Aggressive physical therapy and stretching got me to the start line, but it meant that I'd not run for three weeks. The first 10 miles were good -- on pace and painfree, but after that the tendon started to act up, and our pace dropped off. By mile 17 it was clear that the only way I was going to finish would be walking -- and that did nothing for me. I decided that I'd call it a day, preserve my tendon and consider the day a training run for a yet-to-be named marathon later this summer.

    Pretty disappointing, but I know it was the right decision. I learned a few things during my enforced break from running:

    1. Eliptical training is fine, but horribly boring, and does nothing to prepare the quads for a real run.
    2. All the special running drinks I was using to prevent cramping didn't -- going back to plain water and the drawing board -- got to figure out a way to keep my muscles from seizing up (which they did).
    3. Running is a total sanity check for me -- not having the longer runs to let all the thoughts whizzing around my head settle down was a major bummer.
    4. Having a studly brother as a running partner is a major plus.
    5. Breaking news day before a race is NOT recommended for pre-race focus and concentration.

    It's the journey, always. Lucky me, I have a bit more to go before I hit the finish line for this particular goal.

     
  • Saturday, May 03, 2008 7:57 AM

    See here. Way more interesting than anything that will likely appear in the US press today -- to include the endless presidential campaign we're being inflicted with. I thought that Timothy Noah over in slate did a good job of capturing some of the madness....the press is doing exactly what it tends to do, present two sides of an argument, even if one of them it totally unsupported by facts.

     
More Posts Next page »

Syndication



» Blogs that link here
» View my profile

Powered by Technorati